Huff v. Rodriguez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Huff v. Rodriguez

64 A.D.3d 1225, 881 N.Y.S.2d 357

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 10, 2009

DocketAppeal No. 2

StatusPublished

This text of 64 A.D.3d 1225 (Huff v. Rodriguez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Huff v. Rodriguez, 64 A.D.3d 1225, 881 N.Y.S.2d 357 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Frank A. Sedita, Jr., J.), entered September 26, 2008 in a personal injury action. The order settled the record in appeal No. 1.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Huff v Rodriguez (64 AD3d 1221 [2009]).

All concur; Smith and Fine, JJ., concur in the memorandum insofar as it concerns appeal No. 2 only. Fresent—Martoche, J.E, Smith, Centra, Fahey and Pine, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Frank A. Sedita, Jr., J.), entered September 26, 2008 in a personal injury action. The order settled the record in appeal No. 1.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Huff v Rodriguez (64 AD3d 1221 [2009]).

All concur; Smith and Fine, JJ., concur in the memorandum insofar as it concerns appeal No. 2 only. Fresent—Martoche, J.E, Smith, Centra, Fahey and Pine, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

64 A.D.3d 1225, 881 N.Y.S.2d 357, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huff-v-rodriguez-nyappdiv-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack