Huelsmann v. Division of Workers Compensation
883 S.W.2d 578
Opinion
ORDER
Claimant appeals that portion of the award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) denying her claim against the Second Injury Fund. We affirm. The award of the Commission is supported by substantial and competent evidence. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.-16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Huelsmann v. Division of Workers Compensation, 883 S.W.2d 578 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).
883 S.W.2d 578 (Huelsmann v. Division of Workers Compensation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.