Huelsmann v. Division of Workers Compensation

Missouri Court of Appeals

Huelsmann v. Division of Workers Compensation

883 S.W.2d 578, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1523, 1994 WL 521605

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 27, 1994·No. No. 65574·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Claimant appeals the order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) denying her claim against employer and the Second Injury Fund. We affirm. The award of the Commission is supported by substantial and competent evidence. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.-16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Claimant appeals the order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) denying her claim against employer and the Second Injury Fund. We affirm. The award of the Commission is supported by substantial and competent evidence. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.-16(b).

Huelsmann v. Division of Workers Compensation, 883 S.W.2d 578, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1523, 1994 WL 521605 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

883 S.W.2d 578 (Huelsmann v. Division of Workers Compensation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.