Huebscher v. Huebscher

206 A.D.2d 295, 614 N.Y.S.2d 524, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7332
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 14, 1994·Published·Cited by 14 cases

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Karla Moskowitz, J.), entered June 1, 1993, which, inter alia, allocated child support between the parties, distributed the marital property and valued plaintiffs CPA license, unanimously modified, on the law, the facts and in the [296]*296exercise of discretion to the extent of vacating the allocation of child support, remanding the matter for a recalculation of the parties’ respective support obligations, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiffs testimony that defendant wife’s mother had provided the couple with annual gifts during the course of their marriage, coupled with other evidence of past generosity, was an improper basis upon which to impute such income to the wife for purposes of establishing the proper level of child support, as it assumed that such gift-giving by defendant’s mother would continue in futuro. In any event, since the mother had no legal obligation, this "income” source should not have been taken into account.

The court, moreover, should have reopened the trial to determine whether plaintiff had received a bonus from his employer for the year 1990, and if so, the amount of that bonus.

We have considered defendant’s remaining arguments and deem them to be without merit.

Motion for modification of the unpublished decision and order of this Court entered on June 2, 1994 (Appeal No. 52126-27) is deemed to be a motion for reargument and, upon reargument, the motion is granted, and said decision and order entered on June 2, 1994, which incorrectly rejected deductions for New York City and FICA taxes in calculating "income” for child support purposes (Domestic Relations Law § 240 [1-b] [b] [5]), is recalled and vacated and a new decision and order substituted therefor. Concur—Carro, J. P., Wallach, Ross, Rubin and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Huebscher v. Huebscher, 206 A.D.2d 295, 614 N.Y.S.2d 524, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7332 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

206 A.D.2d 295 (Huebscher v. Huebscher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

M.M. v. R.M.
2024 NY Slip Op 50607(U) (New York Supreme Court, Westchester County, 2024)
Malkani v. Malkani
208 A.D.3d 863 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
Noble v. Noble
78 A.D.3d 1386 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
In Re Marriage of Alter
171 Cal. App. 4th 718 (California Court of Appeal, 2009)
Mirkin v. Mirkin
43 A.D.3d 1115 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
In Re the Marriage of Petersen
22 S.W.3d 760 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2000)
Skinner v. Skinner
271 A.D.2d 679 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Styka v. Styka
1999 NMCA 002 (New Mexico Court of Appeals, 1998)
Isaacs v. Isaacs
246 A.D.2d 428 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Ordini v. Ordini
701 So. 2d 663 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
O'Connor v. O'Connor
241 A.D.2d 648 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Marino v. Marino
229 A.D.2d 971 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Triggs v. Triggs
920 P.2d 653 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1996)
Nass v. Seaton
904 P.2d 412 (Alaska Supreme Court, 1995)