Hudson v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Hudson v. State

302 S.E.2d 139, 165 Ga. App. 456, 1983 Ga. App. LEXIS 1903

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedFebruary 16, 1983

Docket65780

StatusPublished

This text of 302 S.E.2d 139 (Hudson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hudson v. State, 302 S.E.2d 139, 165 Ga. App. 456, 1983 Ga. App. LEXIS 1903 (Ga. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

Banke, Judge.

On appeal from an order revoking the defendant’s probation, defendant’s appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw pursuant to Bethay v. State, 237 Ga. 625 (229 SE2d 406) (1976), accompanying the motion with a brief raising points of law which might arguably support the appeal. After considering these points, and after conducting a thorough examination of the record and transcript to determine independently whether there is any ground for reversal, we are in agreement with counsel that there is no arguable merit to the appeal. Therefore, this court grants the motion to withdraw and affirms the order revoking the defendant’s probation.

Judgment affirmed.

Deen, P. J., and Carley, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Banke, Judge.

On appeal from an order revoking the defendant’s probation, defendant’s appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw pursuant to Bethay v. State, 237 Ga. 625 (229 SE2d 406) (1976), accompanying the motion with a brief raising points of law which might arguably support the appeal. After considering these points, and after conducting a thorough examination of the record and transcript to determine independently whether there is any ground for reversal, we are in agreement with counsel that there is no arguable merit to the appeal. Therefore, this court grants the motion to withdraw and affirms the order revoking the defendant’s probation.

Judgment affirmed.

Deen, P. J., and Carley, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

302 S.E.2d 139, 165 Ga. App. 456, 1983 Ga. App. LEXIS 1903, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hudson-v-state-gactapp-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack