Johnson v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Johnson v. State

224 S.E.2d 376, 236 Ga. 519, 1976 Ga. LEXIS 922

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedMarch 11, 1976

Docket30837

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 224 S.E.2d 376 (Johnson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Johnson v. State, 224 S.E.2d 376, 236 Ga. 519, 1976 Ga. LEXIS 922 (Ga. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Hall, Justice.

This is an appeal from a murder conviction and life sentence. Johnson did not deny the shooting, but claimed it was done in self-defense because of his fear that the victim might use some karate moves on him, take his gun away, and kill him.

The sole enumeration of error was the admission into evidence, over objection, of an investigating officer’s testimony that when he arrived at the scene of the shooting, "I heard a remark from someone in the crowd, I don’t know who it was, someone stated that 'Head didn’t have any business shooting that boy like that.’ ” The officer then testified that he asked 30 or 40 onlookers as to whom they knew by the name of "Head.” The officer then remembered that the appellant went by the alias of Head and continued his investigation, which later centered around the appellant.

Appellant made an incriminatory statement to an officer shortly after his apprehension, and admitted the *520 shooting at the trial. Three eyewitnesses testified at trial to the shooting and stated that the victim was unarmed and made no moves or threatening gestures toward appellant. See Johnson v. State, 136 Ga. 804 (72 SE 233) (1911); Garnett v. State, 10 Ga. App. 109, 114 (72 SE 951) (1911). Assuming without deciding that the alleged statement of the unidentified person was not part of the res gestae (see Gaines v. State, 232 Ga. 727 (208 SE2d 798) (1975)), a study of the entire transcript shows the statement to be at most harmless error.

Argued February 10, 1976 Decided March 11, 1976 Rehearing denied March 23, 1976. Roberts, Roberts & Rainwater, Guy Velpoe Roberts, Jr., for appellant. D. E. Turk, District Attorney, Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, John W. Dunsmore, Jr., Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hall, Justice.

This is an appeal from a murder conviction and life sentence. Johnson did not deny the shooting, but claimed it was done in self-defense because of his fear that the victim might use some karate moves on him, take his gun away, and kill him.

The sole enumeration of error was the admission into evidence, over objection, of an investigating officer’s testimony that when he arrived at the scene of the shooting, "I heard a remark from someone in the crowd, I don’t know who it was, someone stated that 'Head didn’t have any business shooting that boy like that.’ ” The officer then testified that he asked 30 or 40 onlookers as to whom they knew by the name of "Head.” The officer then remembered that the appellant went by the alias of Head and continued his investigation, which later centered around the appellant.

Appellant made an incriminatory statement to an officer shortly after his apprehension, and admitted the *520 shooting at the trial. Three eyewitnesses testified at trial to the shooting and stated that the victim was unarmed and made no moves or threatening gestures toward appellant. See Johnson v. State, 136 Ga. 804 (72 SE 233) (1911); Garnett v. State, 10 Ga. App. 109, 114 (72 SE 951) (1911). Assuming without deciding that the alleged statement of the unidentified person was not part of the res gestae (see Gaines v. State, 232 Ga. 727 (208 SE2d 798) (1975)), a study of the entire transcript shows the statement to be at most harmless error.

Argued February 10, 1976 Decided March 11, 1976 Rehearing denied March 23, 1976. Roberts, Roberts & Rainwater, Guy Velpoe Roberts, Jr., for appellant. D. E. Turk, District Attorney, Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, John W. Dunsmore, Jr., Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

224 S.E.2d 376, 236 Ga. 519, 1976 Ga. LEXIS 922, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-state-ga-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack