Hudson v. State
475 So. 2d 1018, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2220, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16002
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 25, 1985·No. No. 85-574·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
The defendant appeals from his judgment and sentence as a youthful offender contending that the trial court should have considered the sentencing guidelines. Recently, the First District in Braddock v. State, 472 So.2d 875 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985), addressed the issue now before this court and held that the trial court must utilize the sentencing guidelines. Consequently, we reverse and remand for correction of the sentence to comply with the sentencing guidelines.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hudson v. State, 475 So. 2d 1018, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2220, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16002 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).
475 So. 2d 1018 (Hudson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Nealy
532 So. 2d 1117 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Gause v. State
491 So. 2d 320 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)