Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Hudson v. State

Hudson v. State

475 So. 2d 1018, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2220, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16002
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 25, 1985
DocketNo. 85-574
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 475 So. 2d 1018 (Hudson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hudson v. State, 475 So. 2d 1018, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2220, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16002 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant appeals from his judgment and sentence as a youthful offender contending that the trial court should have considered the sentencing guidelines. Recently, the First District in Braddock v. State, 472 So.2d 875 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985), addressed the issue now before this court and held that the trial court must utilize the sentencing guidelines. Consequently, we reverse and remand for correction of the sentence to comply with the sentencing guidelines.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

DOWNEY, LETTS and HURLEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Nealy
532 So. 2d 1117 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Gause v. State
491 So. 2d 320 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
475 So. 2d 1018, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2220, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16002, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hudson-v-state-fladistctapp-1985.