Hudson v. State

444 So. 2d 598, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11653
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 8, 1984
DocketNo. 83-1356
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 444 So. 2d 598 (Hudson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hudson v. State, 444 So. 2d 598, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11653 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Evidence of similar facts is admissible for any purpose if relevant to any material issue, other than propensity or [599]*599bad character, even though such evidence points to commission of another crime. Drake v. State, 400 So.2d 1217 (Fla.1981); Williams v. State, 110 So.2d 654 (Fla.1959); Section 90.404(2)(a), Florida Statutes (1982). Our review of the record also reveals that the State did in fact establish ownership and identity of the stolen property by competent, substantial evidence. Johnson v. State, 353 So.2d 889 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977). See also, State v. Fort, 380 So.2d 534 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980).

AFFIRMED.

GLICKSTEIN and WALDEN, JJ., concur. ANSTEAD, C.J., dissents without opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Crowell v. State
528 So. 2d 535 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
444 So. 2d 598, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11653, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hudson-v-state-fladistctapp-1984.