Hudson v. State

444 So. 2d 598, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11653
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 8, 1984·No. No. 83-1356·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Evidence of similar facts is admissible for any purpose if relevant to any material issue, other than propensity or [599]*599bad character, even though such evidence points to commission of another crime. Drake v. State, 400 So.2d 1217 (Fla.1981); Williams v. State, 110 So.2d 654 (Fla.1959); Section 90.404(2)(a), Florida Statutes (1982). Our review of the record also reveals that the State did in fact establish ownership and identity of the stolen property by competent, substantial evidence. Johnson v. State, 353 So.2d 889 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977). See also, State v. Fort, 380 So.2d 534 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980).

AFFIRMED.

GLICKSTEIN and WALDEN, JJ., concur. ANSTEAD, C.J., dissents without opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hudson v. State, 444 So. 2d 598, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11653 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

444 So. 2d 598 (Hudson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Crowell v. State
528 So. 2d 535 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)