Hudson v. Guestier
This text of 11 U.S. 1 (Hudson v. Guestier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
HUDSON & SMITH
v.
GUESTIER.
Supreme Court of United States.
[Judges present ... . WASHINGTON, LIVINGSTON, TODD, DUVALL, & STORY.[*]]
BY THE COURT, that the case could not be re-heard after the term in which it had been decided.
GENERAL RULE.
Winder, requested information from the Court whether the general rule which directs that only two counsellors should be heard on each side of any cause in this Court, was intended to prevent the division of a cause into distinct points, and the hearing of two counsellors on each point.
Washington, justice. (The chief justice being absent) informed the bar that the Court considered the rule as inflexible, whatever may be the number of points or parties in a cause.
NOTES
[*] The Chief Justice did not attend until Thursday, February 13. He received an injury by the over-setting of the stage coach on his journey from Richmond.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
11 U.S. 1, 3 L. Ed. 249, 7 Cranch 1, 1812 U.S. LEXIS 361, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hudson-v-guestier-scotus-1812.