Hudson v. Guestier

11 U.S. 1, 3 L. Ed. 249, 7 Cranch 1, 1812 U.S. LEXIS 361
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedFebruary 18, 1812
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 11 U.S. 1 (Hudson v. Guestier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hudson v. Guestier, 11 U.S. 1, 3 L. Ed. 249, 7 Cranch 1, 1812 U.S. LEXIS 361 (1812).

Opinion

11 U.S. 1 (1812)
7 Cranch 1

HUDSON & SMITH
v.
GUESTIER.

Supreme Court of United States.

February 3, 1812.
March 12, 1812.
February 10, 1812.

[Judges present ... . WASHINGTON, LIVINGSTON, TODD, DUVALL, & STORY.[*]]

BY THE COURT, that the case could not be re-heard after the term in which it had been decided.

GENERAL RULE.

Winder, requested information from the Court whether the general rule which directs that only two counsellors should be heard on each side of any cause in this Court, was intended to prevent the division of a cause into distinct points, and the hearing of two counsellors on each point.

Washington, justice. (The chief justice being absent) informed the bar that the Court considered the rule as inflexible, whatever may be the number of points or parties in a cause.

NOTES

[*] The Chief Justice did not attend until Thursday, February 13. He received an injury by the over-setting of the stage coach on his journey from Richmond.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Bruce
52 F. Supp. 150 (W.D. Kentucky, 1943)
Gilmore v. United States
131 F.2d 873 (Eighth Circuit, 1942)
United States v. Mayer
235 U.S. 55 (Supreme Court, 1914)
Omaha Electric Light & Power Co. v. City of Omaha
216 F. 848 (Eighth Circuit, 1914)
Burget v. Robinson
123 F. 262 (First Circuit, 1903)
Bushnell v. Crooke Mining & Smelting Co.
150 U.S. 82 (Supreme Court, 1893)
Gratiot v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.
21 S.W. 1094 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1893)
Roberts v. Haggart
29 N.W. 656 (Supreme Court of Dakota, 1886)
Allen v. Wilson
21 F. 881 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan, 1884)
Brooks v. Railroad Co.
102 U.S. 107 (Supreme Court, 1880)
Tyler v. Magwire
84 U.S. 253 (Supreme Court, 1873)
Alanson Saltmarsh v. James W. Tuthill
53 U.S. 387 (Supreme Court, 1852)
People ex rel.Attorney General v. Mayor of New-York
25 Wend. 251 (New York Supreme Court, 1840)
Jameson v. Moseley
20 Ky. 414 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1827)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 U.S. 1, 3 L. Ed. 249, 7 Cranch 1, 1812 U.S. LEXIS 361, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hudson-v-guestier-scotus-1812.