Huckaby v. Brooks

1 Ga. L. Rep. 162
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJuly 1, 1885
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Ga. L. Rep. 162 (Huckaby v. Brooks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Huckaby v. Brooks, 1 Ga. L. Rep. 162 (Ga. 1885).

Opinion

Jackson, C. J.

Where a distress warrant has been sued out and levied on personalty, and subsequently the plaintiff made an affidavit to the effect that the property levied on.was not exempt from levy and sale under the homestead and exemption laws, and thereupon the defendant, without filing any affidavit, denying the indebtedness or giving-bond, made an affidavit that the property was exempt from levy and sale, it was properly dismissed on motion. A counter-affidavit resisting a distress warrant can be filed only by alleging that the debt, or some part of it, is not due, and giving security for the eventual condemnation money. Section 2028 et seq. of the Code, in respect to the mode of arresting the levy of an execution on homesteads and exemptions by counter-affidavit, does not apply to the mode of arresting and stopping the process of distraints for rent. To set up title to property as an exemption or homestead against them, the proper proceeding.is by claim, [163]*163not by counter-affidavit. Code, §§4082, 4083, 2028, 2029, 4084, 3773; 42 Ga., 179; 63 Id., 519, 735.

Allen & Tisinger, for plaintiff in error. B. D. Hardaway, by M. H. Sandwich, for defendant.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hall v. Holmes
42 Ga. 179 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1871)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Ga. L. Rep. 162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huckaby-v-brooks-ga-1885.