Hall v. Holmes
This text of 42 Ga. 179 (Hall v. Holmes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There was no error in the judgment of the Court below in sustaining the demurrer to the complainant’s bill. Inasmuch as the law makes no exception as to the eviction of a tenant who is unable to give bond and security on account of his poverty, a Court of Equity cannot make one, but is as much bound, by the positive law of the land in such cases, as a Court of law would be. Equity follows the law, where the rule of law is applicable, and the analogy of the law, where no rule is directly applicable: Code, 3028. The statute law [183]*183of the State, in relation to landlord and tenant, cannot be altered or changed by simply changing the forum in which the remedy is sought.
Let the judgment of the Court below be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
42 Ga. 179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hall-v-holmes-ga-1871.