Hubert v. State

255 S.E.2d 60, 243 Ga. 567, 1979 Ga. LEXIS 992
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedApril 24, 1979
Docket34958
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 255 S.E.2d 60 (Hubert v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hubert v. State, 255 S.E.2d 60, 243 Ga. 567, 1979 Ga. LEXIS 992 (Ga. 1979).

Opinion

Hill, Justice.

Gregory Hubert brought a petition for writ of habeas corpus to challenge his detention by the Sheriff of Fulton County pursuant to an extradition warrant issued by the Governor of the State of Georgia. His petition was denied by the Superior Court of Fulton County and he appeals.

In his petition Hubert alleged that the documents were not in proper form and were legally insufficient for extradition; that he was not in the State of New York when the alleged crime was committed; and that the ends of justice require that he not be surrendered to the State of New York. Under Michigan v. Doran, — U. S. — (99 SC 530, 58 LE2d 521) (1978), the first of these allegations was the only one the habeas court could decide. Carver v. Stynchcombe, 243 Ga. 477 (1979).

We have examined the documents and find they are in proper form and are legally sufficient. The denial of habeas relief was correct.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hubert v. State
260 S.E.2d 83 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
255 S.E.2d 60, 243 Ga. 567, 1979 Ga. LEXIS 992, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hubert-v-state-ga-1979.