Hubbell v. Martin

218 So. 3d 512, 2017 WL 2457233, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 8298
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 7, 2017·No. No. SD16-1463·Published

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION

PER CURIAM.

We grant appellant’s motion for clarification, withdraw our prior opinion filed April 12, 2017, and substitute the following in its place.

We affirm the dismissal of the matter below but, pursuant to the parties’ agreement, we remand solely for the trial court to strike the phrase “plaintiff shall take nothing by his complaint against Victoria Martin who shall go hence without further day” and to issue an Order that states simply: “ORDERS and ADJUDGES that the said motion be and the same is herewith GRANTED and this cause is dismissed without prejudice.”

Affirmed, remanded with instructions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hubbell v. Martin, 218 So. 3d 512, 2017 WL 2457233, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 8298 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

218 So. 3d 512 (Hubbell v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.