Hubbell v. Martin
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed June 7, 2017.
________________
No. 3D16-1463 Lower Tribunal No. 10-27754 ________________
William H. Hubbell, Appellant,
vs.
Victoria Martin, Appellee.
An appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Barbara Areces, Judge.
Jay M. Levy, P.A. and Jay M. Levy, for appellant.
Elliot L. Miller, for appellee.
Before SUAREZ, C.J., and LAGOA and SCALES, JJ.
ON MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION
PER CURIAM.
We grant appellant’s motion for clarification, withdraw our prior opinion
filed April 12, 2017, and substitute the following in its place. We affirm the dismissal of the matter below but, pursuant to the parties’
agreement, we remand solely for the trial court to strike the phrase “plaintiff shall
take nothing by his complaint against Victoria Martin who shall go hence without
further day” and to issue an Order that states simply: “ORDERS and ADJUDGES
that the said motion be and the same is herewith GRANTED and this cause is
dismissed without prejudice.”
Affirmed, remanded with instructions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hubbell v. Martin (Hubbell v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.