Hubbell v. Commissioner

2 B.T.A. 1168, 1925 BTA LEXIS 2140
CourtUnited States Board of Tax Appeals
DecidedNovember 4, 1925
DocketDocket No. 1312.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2 B.T.A. 1168 (Hubbell v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Board of Tax Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hubbell v. Commissioner, 2 B.T.A. 1168, 1925 BTA LEXIS 2140 (bta 1925).

Opinion

This is an appeal from the determination of a deficiency of $275.53 in income tax for the calendar year 1919. The taxpayer did not appear at the hearing but filed a stipulation as to some of the material facts involved.

FINDINGS OP PACT.

The taxpayer is an individual residing in New York, N. Y. In 1875 he purchased property known as No. 18 Camp Street, Newark, N. J., for use as a residence, for the price of $8,000. He occupied the premises until 1893, when he changed his residence to New York City. He has not been a resident of New Jersey since that date.

After the taxpayer’s removal to New York, his New Jersey property was rented from time to time and the rents received were reported as income in the taxpayer’s income-tax returns.

The New Jersey property was sold by the taxpayer on October 30, 1919, for $7,082.50, or $917.50. less than the cost. The amount of $917.50 was claimed by the taxpayer as a loss in his income-tax return for 1919. This claimed loss was disallowed by the Commissioner.

No deduction for depreciation of the property was taken by the taxpayer in prior income-tax returns. No proof either of the March 1, 1913, value or of what depreciation had been sustained was produced.

DECISION.

The determination of the Commissioner is approved.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hubbell v. Commissioner
2 B.T.A. 1168 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 B.T.A. 1168, 1925 BTA LEXIS 2140, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hubbell-v-commissioner-bta-1925.