Hruska v. James Stewart Co., Inc.
78 N.E.2d 859, 297 N.Y. 829, 1948 N.Y. LEXIS 939
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs, upon the ground that the record established plaintiff’s contributory negligence as matter of law. No opinion. [See 298 N. Y. 510.]
Concur: Lewis, Desmond, Thacher and Dye, JJ. Dissenting: Loughean, Ch. J., Conway and Fuld, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hruska v. James Stewart Co., Inc., 78 N.E.2d 859, 297 N.Y. 829, 1948 N.Y. LEXIS 939 (N.Y. 1948).
78 N.E.2d 859 (Hruska v. James Stewart Co., Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Camacho v. Tabak
18 A.D.2d 609 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1962)
Brook v. Swezey
3 A.D.2d 747 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1957)
Midgett v. Mastropoalo
277 A.D.2d 792 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1950)
Hruska v. James Stewart Co., Inc.
80 N.E.2d 658 (New York Court of Appeals, 1948)