H.R. v. District of Columbia

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia
DecidedJune 10, 2022
DocketCivil Action No. 2021-1856
StatusPublished

This text of H.R. v. District of Columbia (H.R. v. District of Columbia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
H.R. v. District of Columbia, (D.D.C. 2022).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

H.R. et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v. Civil Action No. 21-1856 (TJK/RMM)

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA,

Defendant.

ORDER

On April 29, 2022, Magistrate Judge Robin M. Meriweather entered a Report and

Recommendation (“R&R”) regarding Plaintiff’s preliminary injunction motion. ECF No. 8. To

date, no objections to the R&R have been filed, and the time to file such an objection has lapsed.

Local Civil Rule 72.3(b); see also ECF No. 8 at 16 (noting that “any party who objects to the

[R&R] . . . must file a written objection thereto within 14 days”). Thus, any objections are deemed

waived. See, e.g., Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149–55 (1985).

The Court, upon independent consideration of the R&R, the lack of any objection, the

entire record, and the applicable law, agrees with the recommendations made in the R&R.

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED that the R&R, ECF No. 8, is ADOPTED in its entirety; it is further

ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction, ECF No. 4, is GRANTED.

SO ORDERED.

/s/ Timothy J. Kelly TIMOTHY J. KELLY United States District Judge

Date: June 10, 2022

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thomas v. Arn
474 U.S. 140 (Supreme Court, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
H.R. v. District of Columbia, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hr-v-district-of-columbia-dcd-2022.