H.R. v. District of Columbia
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
H.R. et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v. Civil Action No. 21-1856 (TJK/RMM)
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA,
Defendant.
ORDER
On April 29, 2022, Magistrate Judge Robin M. Meriweather entered a Report and
Recommendation (“R&R”) regarding Plaintiff’s preliminary injunction motion. ECF No. 8. To
date, no objections to the R&R have been filed, and the time to file such an objection has lapsed.
Local Civil Rule 72.3(b); see also ECF No. 8 at 16 (noting that “any party who objects to the
[R&R] . . . must file a written objection thereto within 14 days”). Thus, any objections are deemed
waived. See, e.g., Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149–55 (1985).
The Court, upon independent consideration of the R&R, the lack of any objection, the
entire record, and the applicable law, agrees with the recommendations made in the R&R.
Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED that the R&R, ECF No. 8, is ADOPTED in its entirety; it is further
ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction, ECF No. 4, is GRANTED.
SO ORDERED.
/s/ Timothy J. Kelly TIMOTHY J. KELLY United States District Judge
Date: June 10, 2022
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
H.R. v. District of Columbia (H.R. v. District of Columbia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.