H.R. v. District of Columbia
This text of H.R. v. District of Columbia (H.R. v. District of Columbia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
H.R. et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v. Civil Action No. 21-1856 (TJK/RMM)
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA,
Defendant.
ORDER
On April 29, 2022, Magistrate Judge Robin M. Meriweather entered a Report and
Recommendation (“R&R”) regarding Plaintiff’s preliminary injunction motion. ECF No. 8. To
date, no objections to the R&R have been filed, and the time to file such an objection has lapsed.
Local Civil Rule 72.3(b); see also ECF No. 8 at 16 (noting that “any party who objects to the
[R&R] . . . must file a written objection thereto within 14 days”). Thus, any objections are deemed
waived. See, e.g., Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149–55 (1985).
The Court, upon independent consideration of the R&R, the lack of any objection, the
entire record, and the applicable law, agrees with the recommendations made in the R&R.
Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED that the R&R, ECF No. 8, is ADOPTED in its entirety; it is further
ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction, ECF No. 4, is GRANTED.
SO ORDERED.
/s/ Timothy J. Kelly TIMOTHY J. KELLY United States District Judge
Date: June 10, 2022
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
H.R. v. District of Columbia, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hr-v-district-of-columbia-dcd-2022.