H.R. v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia·Decided June 10, 2022·No. Civil Action No. 2021-1856·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

H.R. et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v. Civil Action No. 21-1856 (TJK/RMM)

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA,

Defendant.

ORDER

On April 29, 2022, Magistrate Judge Robin M. Meriweather entered a Report and

Recommendation (“R&R”) regarding Plaintiff’s preliminary injunction motion. ECF No. 8. To

date, no objections to the R&R have been filed, and the time to file such an objection has lapsed.

Local Civil Rule 72.3(b); see also ECF No. 8 at 16 (noting that “any party who objects to the

[R&R] . . . must file a written objection thereto within 14 days”). Thus, any objections are deemed

waived. See, e.g., Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149–55 (1985).

The Court, upon independent consideration of the R&R, the lack of any objection, the

entire record, and the applicable law, agrees with the recommendations made in the R&R.

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED that the R&R, ECF No. 8, is ADOPTED in its entirety; it is further

ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction, ECF No. 4, is GRANTED.

SO ORDERED.

/s/ Timothy J. Kelly TIMOTHY J. KELLY United States District Judge

Date: June 10, 2022

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

H.R. v. District of Columbia, (D.D.C. 2022).

H.R. v. District of Columbia (H.R. v. District of Columbia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thomas v. Arn
474 U.S. 140 (Supreme Court, 1986)