Hoyt v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.

52 N.E. 1127, 177 Ill. 617
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 17, 1899
StatusPublished

This text of 52 N.E. 1127 (Hoyt v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hoyt v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co., 52 N.E. 1127, 177 Ill. 617 (Ill. 1899).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Cartwright

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is one of three actions of covenant brought by appellants in the superior court of Cook county, against appellee, on a lease and agreement executed February 18, 1880, by appellee as party of the first part, and Alfred M. Hoyt, George L. Dunlap and others as parties of the second part. Plaintiffs recovered judgments in the superior court, which were reversed by the Appellate Court. (Chicago, Milwaukee and St. Paul Railway Co. v. Hoyt, 50 Ill. App. 583.) The cases were not remanded, and appeals were prosecuted to this court. The lease and agreement were construed and the questions involved in all the cases were decided in the case of Dunlap v. Chicago, Milwaukee and St. Paul Railway Co. 151 Ill. 409. The decision in that case, in which an opinion was filed, controls this case, and the judgment of the Appellate Court will therefore be affirmed.

r 7 , ... 7 Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dunlap v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.
38 N.E. 89 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1894)
Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Ry. Co. v. Hoyt
50 Ill. App. 583 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1893)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
52 N.E. 1127, 177 Ill. 617, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoyt-v-chicago-milwaukee-st-paul-railway-co-ill-1899.