Howell v. United States

668 F. App'x 28
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 16, 2016·No. No. 16-1220·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit

PER CURIAM:

Burl Anderson Howell appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and denying his motions for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Howell’s pending motions and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Howell v. United States, No. 5:14-cv-00898-F (E.D.N.C. Feb. 29, 2016; Nov. 24, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Howell v. United States, 668 F. App'x 28 (4th Cir. 2016).

668 F. App'x 28 (Howell v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Windsor v. United States
E.D. Virginia, 2023
Burl Anderson Howell v. United States
672 F. App'x 313 (Fourth Circuit, 2017)