Burl Anderson Howell v. United States
This text of 672 F. App'x 313 (Burl Anderson Howell v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Burl Anderson Howell appeals the district court’s September 28, 2016 order denying his post-judgment motion as moot. He also seeks to appeal the district court’s November 24, 2015 and February 29, 2016 orders dismissing his civil action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and denying reconsideration.
Howell previously appealed, and we previously affirmed, the district court’s November 24, 2015 and February 29, 2016 orders. See Howell v. United States, No. 16-1220, 668 Fed.Appx. 28, 2016 WL 4363146 (4th Cir. Aug. 16, 2016). To the extent that Howell again seeks to appeal these or any earlier orders of the district court, we dismiss the appeal as untimely. As for the district court’s September 28, 2016 order denying his post-judgment motion as moot, we have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Howell’s pending motion and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Howell v. United States, No. 5:14-cv-00898-F (E.D.N.C. Sept. 28, 2016).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are ade *314 quately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED IN PART; AFFIRMED IN PART
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
672 F. App'x 313, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burl-anderson-howell-v-united-states-ca4-2017.