Howell v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

189 S.E. 764, 211 N.C. 297, 1937 N.C. LEXIS 73

• Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina
• Decided: February 24, 1937
• Status: Published

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

An examination of the evidence appearing in the record in this appeal fails to disclose any evidence tending to show that the death of plaintiff’s intestate was caused by the negligence of the defendants, or of either of them, as alleged in the complaint. For that reason there is no error in the judgment dismissing the action. The judgment is affirmed on the authority of Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company v. Berry, 286 U. S., 272, 76 L. Ed., 1098.

Both Cobia v. R. R., 188 N. C., 487, 125 S. E., 18, and Puget Sound Electric Railway v. Harrigan, 176 Fed., 488, which are relied upon by the plaintiff to support her contention that there is error in the judgment, are easily distinguishable from the instant case.

In Cobia, v. R. R., supra, it was not seriously disputed that there was evidence tending to show that defendant was negligent as contended by the plaintiff. It was held that upon the facts shown by the evidence, the question of assumption of risk, relied upon by the defendant to defeat plaintiff’s recovery, was properly left to the jury. For that reason the judgment was affirmed.

In Puget Sound Electric Railway v. Harrigan, supra, there was evidence tending to show that appellant had failed to exercise reasonable care with respect to the condition of the platform from which the appel-lee fell, while engaged in the performance of his duties as a brakeman. In the instant case, plaintiff’s intestate was an experienced fireman, and knew the conditions which confronted him when he left his place in the cab of the engine. His fall into the creek, and subsequent death by drowning, were the result of his own negligence, or at least were accidental. In neither event are the defendants liable in this action to the plaintiff. The judgment is

Affirmed.