Howe v. Lowe

137 So. 521, 133 So. 549, 103 Fla. 1196
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedApril 6, 1931
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 137 So. 521 (Howe v. Lowe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Howe v. Lowe, 137 So. 521, 133 So. 549, 103 Fla. 1196 (Fla. 1931).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

In this cause Mr. Chief Justice Buford, Mr. Justice Ellis and Mr. Justice Davis are of opinion that the decree of the Circuit Court should be affirmed while Mr. Justice Whitfield, Mr. Justice Terrell and Mr. *1197 Justice Brown are of opinion that the decree should he reversed. When the members of the Supreme Court are sitting six members in a body and after full consultation, it appears that the members of the court are permanently and equally divided in opinion as to whether the decree should be affirmed or reversed, arid there is no prospect of an immediate change in the personnel of the court, the decree should be affirmed; therefore it is considered, ordered and adjudged under the authority of State ex rel. Hampton vs. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 South. Rep. 51, that the decree of the Circuit Court in this cause be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Buford, C.J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, Brown and Davis, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Howe v. Sands
194 So. 798 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1940)
Boyle v. Howe
171 So. 667 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1935)
Howe v. Fry
157 So. 331 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
137 So. 521, 133 So. 549, 103 Fla. 1196, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howe-v-lowe-fla-1931.