Boyle v. Howe

171 So. 667, 126 Fla. 662, 1935 Fla. LEXIS 1798
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedDecember 27, 1935
StatusPublished
Cited by15 cases

This text of 171 So. 667 (Boyle v. Howe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Boyle v. Howe, 171 So. 667, 126 Fla. 662, 1935 Fla. LEXIS 1798 (Fla. 1935).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

In this cause Mr. Chief Justice Whitfield, Mr. Justice Buford and Mr. Justice Davis are of the opinion that the decree of the Circuit Court should be affirmed as to Pelchat and reversed as to Bethel and Boyle, while Mr. Presiding Justice Ellis, Mr. justice Terrell and Mr. Justice Brown are of the opinion that the decree of the Circuit Court should be affirmed. When the members of the Supreme Court, sitting six members in a body and after full consultation, it appears that the members of the Court are permanently and equally divided in opinion as to whether the decree should be affirmed or reversed, and there is no prospect of an immediate change in the personnel of the Court, the decree should 'be affirmed; therefore it is considered, ordered and adjudged under the authority of State, ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 So. Rep. 51, that the decree of the Circuit Court in this cause be and the same is hereby affirmed.

*664 Affirmed.

Whitfield, C. J., and Ellis, Terrell, Brown, Buford, • and Davis, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Owen
324 B.R. 373 (N.D. Florida, 2004)
Elliott v. Krause
490 So. 2d 956 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
BARNETT FIRST NAT. BANK, ETC. v. Cobden
393 So. 2d 78 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Roberts v. Bolton
367 So. 2d 269 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
Mollard v. Austin
98 So. 2d 814 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1957)
In Re Mollard's Estate
98 So. 2d 814 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1957)
Crane v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.
281 S.W.2d 117 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1955)
In re Bradstreet's Will
5 Fla. Supp. 70 (Palm Beach County Judge's Court, 1954)
Richardson v. State Compensation Commissioner
74 S.E.2d 258 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1953)
In Re Williams'estate
59 So. 2d 13 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1952)
Christian Herald Ass'n v. First Nat. Bank of Tampa
40 So. 2d 563 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1949)
Howe v. Sands
194 So. 798 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1940)
Howe v. MacDonald
194 So. 802 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1940)
Estate of Fletcher
97 P.2d 1039 (California Court of Appeal, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
171 So. 667, 126 Fla. 662, 1935 Fla. LEXIS 1798, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boyle-v-howe-fla-1935.