Howards v. McLaughlin
Opinion
ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
This matter is before us on remand from the Supreme Court. In Howards v. McLaughlin, 634 F.3d 1131 (10th Cir.2011), we reversed the district court’s denial of qualified immunity as to all Secret Service Agents on Mr. Howards’ Fourth Amendment claims, id. at 1143. We also reversed the district court’s denial of qualified immunity on Mr. Howards’ First Amendment claim as to Agents Daniels and McLaughlin, but affirmed such denial as to Agents Reichle and Doyle. Id. at 1149-50.
The Supreme Court has now reversed our judgment, holding that Agents Reichle and Doyle also are entitled to qualified immunity on the First Amendment claim. Reichle v. Howards, — U.S. -, -, 132 S.Ct. 2088, 2097, 182 L.Ed.2d 985 *529 (2012). Accordingly, all these defendants are entitled to qualified immunity.
Therefore, we REVERSE the district court’s denial of qualified immunity as to these defendants and REMAND for entry of judgment in favor of these defendants.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
478 F. App'x 528 (Howards v. McLaughlin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.