Howard v. State

109 S.E. 534, 27 Ga. App. 554, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 258
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Howard v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 25 Ga. App. 408
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 16, 1921·No. 10870·Published

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

Upon a writ of certiorari in this case the Supreme Court held: “The language employed in section 10 of the act of November 30, 1915 (Acts Extraordinary Session 1915, p. 107), relating to the regulation of motor-vehicles and motorcycles and their rate of speed upon the highways of this State, and providing that a motor-vehicle shall not be operated upon any public street or highway at a speed greater than is reasonable and safe,’ is so indefinite as to render that part of the statute void. Moreover, since the decision of this case by the Court of Appeals, the portion of the statute above referred to has by this court been held to be unconstitutional and void.” For full opinion of the Supreme Court see 151 Ga. 845 (108 S. E. 513). See also Jones v. State, 151 Ga. 502 (107 S. E. 765), where the. statute in question is held unconstitutional and void. As; under the foregoing ruling, the former judgment of this court must be vacated and a new trial ordered, it is unnecessary to deal with the other grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Howard v. State, 109 S.E. 534, 27 Ga. App. 554, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 258 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

109 S.E. 534 (Howard v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jones v. State
107 S.E. 765 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1921)
Howard v. State
108 S.E. 513 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1921)