Howard v. State

99 S.E. 890, 24 Ga. App. 144, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 459
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 23, 1919
Docket10603
StatusPublished

This text of 99 S.E. 890 (Howard v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Howard v. State, 99 S.E. 890, 24 Ga. App. 144, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 459 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

Opinion

Broyles, P. J.

In this case the record discloses no evidence which authorized the defendant’s conviction of the offense of burglary, and the court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Bloodworth and Stephens, JJ., concur. IF. F. Mann, Gordon Mann, George G. Glenn, Ralph II. Mouse, for plaintiff in error. J. M. Lang, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
99 S.E. 890, 24 Ga. App. 144, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 459, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howard-v-state-gactapp-1919.