Howard v. Harper

440 So. 2d 445, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22749
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 26, 1983·No. No. 83-1569·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of prohibition is denied. Petitioners, defendants in the trial court, executed a written waiver of their speedy trial rights. Consequently, the strictures of Rule 3.191, Fla.R.Crim.P., are inapplicable at this stage of the proceedings. See Butterworth v. Fluellen, 389 So.2d 968 (Fla.1980); Gallego v. Purdy, 415 So.2d 166 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982).

LETTS and HURLEY, JJ., concur. WALDEN, J., dissents with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Howard v. Harper, 440 So. 2d 445, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22749 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

440 So. 2d 445 (Howard v. Harper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gallego v. Purdy
415 So. 2d 166 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Lowe v. Price
437 So. 2d 142 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1983)
Butterworth in and for Broward Cty. v. Fluellen
389 So. 2d 968 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1980)
State Ex Rel. Butler v. Cullen
253 So. 2d 861 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1971)