Howard Meredith v. State of Oregon Bruce A. Warner, Director of Oregon Department of Transportation Jimmy L. Odom, Outdoor Advertising Technician
326 F.3d 1030, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 7313, 2003 WL 1896212
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided April 18, 2003·No. 01-35869·Published·Cited by 7 cases
Opinion
ORDER
The Opinion in this case, reported at 321 F.3d 807 (9th Cir.2003), is amended as follows:
1. Delete the paragraph on pages 815-16 that begins “We have held that we have jurisdiction ...” and ends “Thomas v. Nakatani, 309 F.3d 1203, 1207-08 (9th Cir.2002).”
2. Delete the word “Similarly” in the first line of the first full paragraph on page 816 and replace it with the words “For instance.”
It is further ordered that no petitions for rehearing or rehearing en banc shall be filed in response to this order.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Howard Meredith v. State of Oregon Bruce A. Warner, Director of Oregon Department of Transportation Jimmy L. Odom, Outdoor Advertising Technician, 326 F.3d 1030, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 7313, 2003 WL 1896212 (9th Cir. 2003).
326 F.3d 1030 (Howard Meredith v. State of Oregon Bruce A. Warner, Director of Oregon Department of Transportation Jimmy L. Odom, Outdoor Advertising Technician) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ross Cornell v. Office of the District Attorney, County of Riverside
C.D. California, 2022
Puente Arizona v. Joseph Arpaio
821 F.3d 1098 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)
The Arc of California v. Toby Douglas
757 F.3d 975 (Ninth Circuit, 2014)
Manuel De Jesus Ortega Melendr v. Joseph M. Arpaio
695 F.3d 990 (Ninth Circuit, 2012)
Consejo De Desarrollo Economico De Mexicali, AC v. United States
438 F. Supp. 2d 1207 (D. Nevada, 2006)
Adibi v. California State Board of Pharmacy
393 F. Supp. 2d 999 (N.D. California, 2005)
Smith v. Arthur Andersen LLP
421 F.3d 989 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)