Houston v. Houston

Supreme Court of Georgia

Houston v. Houston

197 S.E. 237, 186 Ga. 140, 1938 Ga. LEXIS 564

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided May 11, 1938·No. No. 12331·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Gbioe, Justice.

The discretion of the judge in awarding temporary alimony and attorney’s fees will not be disturbed, unless abused; and under the facts of this case there was no abuse of discretion in awarding the moderate sums here shown. Gaulding v. Gaulding, 184 Ga. 689 (192 S. E. 724), and cit.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Wyatt Morgan, for plaintiff in error. • S. H. Dyer, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gbioe, Justice.

The discretion of the judge in awarding temporary alimony and attorney’s fees will not be disturbed, unless abused; and under the facts of this case there was no abuse of discretion in awarding the moderate sums here shown. Gaulding v. Gaulding, 184 Ga. 689 (192 S. E. 724), and cit.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Wyatt Morgan, for plaintiff in error. • S. H. Dyer, contra.

Houston v. Houston, 197 S.E. 237, 186 Ga. 140, 1938 Ga. LEXIS 564 (Ga. 1938).

Pincite

197 S.E. 237 (Houston v. Houston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related