Green v. Green

Supreme Court of Georgia

Green v. Green

114 S.E.2d 880, 216 Ga. 113, 1960 Ga. LEXIS 403

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedJune 9, 1960

Docket20883

StatusPublished

This text of 114 S.E.2d 880 (Green v. Green) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Green v. Green, 114 S.E.2d 880, 216 Ga. 113, 1960 Ga. LEXIS 403 (Ga. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

Candler, Justice.

The discretion of the judge in awarding temporary alimony in a pending suit for permanent alimony will not be disturbed, unless abused; and under the facts of this case, there was no abuse of- discretion in the award that was made for the petitioner and her three small children, custody of whom had been placed in her. Gaulding v. Gaulding, 184 Ga. 689 (192 S. E. 724) ; Houston v. Houston, 186 Ga. 140 (197 S. E. 237).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Candler, Justice.

The discretion of the judge in awarding temporary alimony in a pending suit for permanent alimony will not be disturbed, unless abused; and under the facts of this case, there was no abuse of- discretion in the award that was made for the petitioner and her three small children, custody of whom had been placed in her. Gaulding v. Gaulding, 184 Ga. 689 (192 S. E. 724) ; Houston v. Houston, 186 Ga. 140 (197 S. E. 237).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

114 S.E.2d 880, 216 Ga. 113, 1960 Ga. LEXIS 403, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/green-v-green-ga-1960.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack