Green v. Green
114 S.E.2d 880, 216 Ga. 113, 1960 Ga. LEXIS 403
Opinion
The discretion of the judge in awarding temporary alimony in a pending suit for permanent alimony will not be disturbed, unless abused; and under the facts of this case, there was no abuse of- discretion in the award that was made for the petitioner and her three small children, custody of whom had been placed in her. Gaulding v. Gaulding, 184 Ga. 689 (192 S. E. 724) ; Houston v. Houston, 186 Ga. 140 (197 S. E. 237).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Green v. Green, 114 S.E.2d 880, 216 Ga. 113, 1960 Ga. LEXIS 403 (Ga. 1960).
114 S.E.2d 880 (Green v. Green) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gaulding v. Gaulding
192 S.E. 724 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1937)
Houston v. Houston
197 S.E. 237 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1938)