Green v. Green

114 S.E.2d 880, 216 Ga. 113, 1960 Ga. LEXIS 403
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided June 9, 1960·No. 20883·Published

Opinion

Candler, Justice.

The discretion of the judge in awarding temporary alimony in a pending suit for permanent alimony will not be disturbed, unless abused; and under the facts of this case, there was no abuse of- discretion in the award that was made for the petitioner and her three small children, custody of whom had been placed in her. Gaulding v. Gaulding, 184 Ga. 689 (192 S. E. 724) ; Houston v. Houston, 186 Ga. 140 (197 S. E. 237).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Green v. Green, 114 S.E.2d 880, 216 Ga. 113, 1960 Ga. LEXIS 403 (Ga. 1960).

114 S.E.2d 880 (Green v. Green) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gaulding v. Gaulding
192 S.E. 724 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1937)
Houston v. Houston
197 S.E. 237 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1938)