Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. Bowles
168 U.S. 706, 42 L. Ed. 1213, 18 S. Ct. 943, 1897 U.S. LEXIS 1760
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 8, 1897·No. No. 92; No. 284·Published·Cited by 7 cases
Opinion
Judgments affirmed with costs and interest on the authority of Pennsylvania Railroad v. Jones, 155 U. S. 333, 350; Railroad Company v. Brown, 17 Wall. 445, 450; Texas & Pacific Railway v. Johnson, 151 U. S. 81; Texas & Pacific Railway v. Bloom’s Administrator, 164 U. S. 636.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. Bowles, 168 U.S. 706, 42 L. Ed. 1213, 18 S. Ct. 943, 1897 U.S. LEXIS 1760 (1897).
168 U.S. 706 (Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. Bowles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Joanne Bair v. American Motors Corporation
473 F.2d 740 (Third Circuit, 1973)
New York & Cuba Mail S. S. Co. v. Continental Ins. Co. of New York
117 F.2d 404 (Second Circuit, 1941)
Mooney v. McCarthy
181 A. 117 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1935)
Madden v. La Cofske
72 F.2d 602 (Ninth Circuit, 1934)
George B. Scrambling Co. v. Tennant Drug Co.
158 N.E. 282 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1927)
Houston & T. C. R. v. City of Ennis
201 S.W. 256 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1918)