House v. State Hospital Insurance
This text of 113 S.E.2d 201 (House v. State Hospital Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant argues the court erred in setting the verdict aside because, as it contends, there was no evidence on which the jury could have returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff. In this manner it seeks to review the court’s ruling in overruling the motion to nonsuit. No judgment has been rendered against defendant. It may not, by challenging the exercise of the court’s discretion in setting the verdict aside, present for determination the correctness of the court’s ruling on the motion to nonsuit. White v. Keller, 242 N.C. 97, 86 S.E. 2d 795; Byrd v. Hampton, 243 N.C. 627, 91 S.E. 2d 671.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
113 S.E.2d 201, 252 N.C. 189, 1960 N.C. LEXIS 405, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/house-v-state-hospital-insurance-nc-1960.