House v. State Hospital Insurance

Supreme Court of North Carolina

House v. State Hospital Insurance

113 S.E.2d 201, 252 N.C. 189, 1960 N.C. LEXIS 405

Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided March 16, 1960·Published

Opinion

PER CuRiam.

Defendant argues the court erred in setting the verdict aside because, as it contends, there was no evidence on which the jury could have returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff. In this manner it seeks to review the court’s ruling in overruling the motion to nonsuit. No judgment has been rendered against defendant. It may not, by challenging the exercise of the court’s discretion in setting the verdict aside, present for determination the correctness of the court’s ruling on the motion to nonsuit. White v. Keller, 242 N.C. 97, 86 S.E. 2d 795; Byrd v. Hampton, 243 N.C. 627, 91 S.E. 2d 671.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CuRiam.

Defendant argues the court erred in setting the verdict aside because, as it contends, there was no evidence on which the jury could have returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff. In this manner it seeks to review the court’s ruling in overruling the motion to nonsuit. No judgment has been rendered against defendant. It may not, by challenging the exercise of the court’s discretion in setting the verdict aside, present for determination the correctness of the court’s ruling on the motion to nonsuit. White v. Keller, 242 N.C. 97, 86 S.E. 2d 795; Byrd v. Hampton, 243 N.C. 627, 91 S.E. 2d 671.

Appeal dismissed.

House v. State Hospital Insurance, 113 S.E.2d 201, 252 N.C. 189, 1960 N.C. LEXIS 405 (N.C. 1960).

Pincite

113 S.E.2d 201 (House v. State Hospital Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related