Byrd v. Hampton

91 S.E.2d 671, 243 N.C. 627, 1956 N.C. LEXIS 589
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided February 29, 1956·No. 90·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per OüRIAm.

There were, as stated, a number of interlocutory rulings made during the progress of the trial. However, no final judgment was entered from which an appeal could be prosecuted, and the court, in the exercise of its discretion, set the verdict aside. Roberts v. Hill, 240 N.C. 373, 82 S.E. 2d 373. Hence the record as it now appears before us contains no final judgment from which appeal will lie. In view of this condition of the record, it is necessary to vacate, without prejudice, all interlocutory rulings made during the progress of the trial, and to remand the cause for a trial de novo as to all parties and as to all questions raised by the pleadings. It is so ordered.

Venire de novo.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Byrd v. Hampton, 91 S.E.2d 671, 243 N.C. 627, 1956 N.C. LEXIS 589 (N.C. 1956).

91 S.E.2d 671 (Byrd v. Hampton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sizemore v. Raxter
293 S.E.2d 294 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1982)
Atkins v. Doub
133 S.E.2d 456 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1963)
House v. State Hospital Insurance
113 S.E.2d 201 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1960)