House v. Fogleman

195 S.W.3d 897, 359 Ark. 206
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedOctober 15, 2004
Docket04-1072
StatusPublished

This text of 195 S.W.3d 897 (House v. Fogleman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
House v. Fogleman, 195 S.W.3d 897, 359 Ark. 206 (Ark. 2004).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Petitioners move for an accelerated proceeding and petition for writ of certiorari and mandamus. We deny the petition for certiorari and mandamus. The Petitioners seek an order from this court vacating the orders of the circuit court and directing the West Memphis city clerk to count the signatures on the petitions before a deficiency in the petitions due to the absence of an enacting clause on the proposed initiative is addressed. A second issue is whether amended petitions filed less than sixty days before the General Election violated Article 5, § 1 of the Arkansas Constitution.

At this writing, the General Election will be held in seventeen days. That time frame does not allow this court sufficient time to have the matter thoroughly briefed and reviewed. See, e.g., Stilley v. Young, 342 Ark. 378, 28 S.W.3d 858 (2000) (per curiam). Moreover, the petitioners rely on two cases that have been overruled by this court. See Finn v. McCuen, 303 Ark. 418, 798 S.W.2d 34 (1990) and Scott v. McCuen, 289 Ark. 41, 709 S.W.2d 77 (1986), overruled by Stilley v. Priest, 341 Ark. 329, 16 S.W.3d 251 (2000).

Petition denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stilley v. Priest
16 S.W.3d 251 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2000)
Finn v. McCuen
798 S.W.2d 34 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1990)
Scott v. McCuen
709 S.W.2d 77 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1986)
Stilley v. Young
28 S.W.3d 858 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
195 S.W.3d 897, 359 Ark. 206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/house-v-fogleman-ark-2004.