Hotel Employees Local No. 255 v. Leedom

358 U.S. 99, 79 S. Ct. 150, 3 L. Ed. 2d 143, 1958 U.S. LEXIS 1794, 43 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2137
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 24, 1958·No. 21·Published·Cited by 46 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We believe that dismissal of the representation petition on the sole ground of the Board’s "long standing policy not to exercise jurisdiction over the hotel industry” as a class, is contrary to the principles expressed in Office Employes v. Labor Board, 353 U. S. 313, 318-320 (1957). The judgment is therefore reversed and the case remanded to the Court of Appeals for proceedings not inconsistent herewith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hotel Employees Local No. 255 v. Leedom, 358 U.S. 99, 79 S. Ct. 150, 3 L. Ed. 2d 143, 1958 U.S. LEXIS 1794, 43 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2137 (1958).

358 U.S. 99 (Hotel Employees Local No. 255 v. Leedom) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

No. 73-1515
495 F.2d 1195 (Third Circuit, 1974)
National Maritime Union v. National Labor Relations Board
267 F. Supp. 117 (S.D. New York, 1967)
Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States
379 U.S. 241 (Supreme Court, 1965)