Hosey v. Berry

Michigan Supreme Court

Hosey v. Berry

735 N.W.2d 268, 479 Mich. 862

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 30, 2007

Docket133577

StatusPublished

This text of 735 N.W.2d 268 (Hosey v. Berry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hosey v. Berry, 735 N.W.2d 268, 479 Mich. 862 (Mich. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

735 N.W.2d 268 (2007)

Amelia HOSEY, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Chantay Starghill BERRY, Defendant-Appellant.

Docket No. 133577. COA No. 272336.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

July 30, 2007.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 22, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court prior to the completion of the proceedings ordered by the Court of Appeals.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

735 N.W.2d 268 (2007)

Amelia HOSEY, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Chantay Starghill BERRY, Defendant-Appellant.

Docket No. 133577. COA No. 272336.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

July 30, 2007.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 22, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court prior to the completion of the proceedings ordered by the Court of Appeals.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

735 N.W.2d 268, 479 Mich. 862, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hosey-v-berry-mich-2007.

Opinion

Amelia HOSEY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Chantay Starghill BERRY, Defendant-Appellant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Amelia HOSEY, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Chantay Starghill BERRY, Defendant-Appellant.