Hosey v. Berry

Michigan Supreme Court

Hosey v. Berry

735 N.W.2d 268, 479 Mich. 862

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hosey v. Berry. Read the opinion of the Court — 477 Mich. 855 →

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided July 30, 2007·No. 133577·Published

Opinion

735 N.W.2d 268 (2007)

Amelia HOSEY, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Chantay Starghill BERRY, Defendant-Appellant.

Docket No. 133577. COA No. 272336.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

July 30, 2007.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 22, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court prior to the completion of the proceedings ordered by the Court of Appeals.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

735 N.W.2d 268 (2007)

Amelia HOSEY, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Chantay Starghill BERRY, Defendant-Appellant.

Docket No. 133577. COA No. 272336.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

July 30, 2007.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 22, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court prior to the completion of the proceedings ordered by the Court of Appeals.

Hosey v. Berry, 735 N.W.2d 268, 479 Mich. 862 (Mich. 2007).

Pincite

735 N.W.2d 268 (Hosey v. Berry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Amelia HOSEY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Chantay Starghill BERRY, Defendant-Appellant.

Amelia HOSEY, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Chantay Starghill BERRY, Defendant-Appellant.