Hosey v. Berry
725 N.W.2d 52, 477 Mich. 977
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hosey v. Berry. Read the opinion of the Court — 477 Mich. 855 →
Opinion
Amelia HOSEY, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Chantay Starghill BERRY, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On December 14, 2006, the Court heard oral argument on the application for leave to appeal the April 6, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals. On order of the Court, the application is again considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court prior to the completion of the proceedings ordered by the Court of Appeals.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hosey v. Berry, 725 N.W.2d 52, 477 Mich. 977 (Mich. 2006).
725 N.W.2d 52 (Hosey v. Berry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.