Hosch v. Smith

115 S.E. 646, 154 Ga. 789, 1923 Ga. LEXIS 394
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided January 20, 1923·No. No. 3155·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

This is a contest on a money rule, and involves competition between a mortgage fi. fa., based on the judgment of foreclosure of an unrecorded mortgage, and an execution based upon a judgment in attachment, the attachment having been levied after commencement of the suit to foreclose the mortgage and prior to the judgment absolute rendered in that case. Under the pleadings and the evidence no facts were involved which would entitle either party to equitable relief. The remedy is purely statutory; and the case is not of that class of which the Supreme Court has jurisdiction, but is of the Mass of which the Court of Appeals has jurisdiction. Elmore v. Southern Bank & Trust Co., 150 Ga. 811 (105 S. E. 474).

Transferred to Court of Appeals...

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hosch v. Smith, 115 S.E. 646, 154 Ga. 789, 1923 Ga. LEXIS 394 (Ga. 1923).

115 S.E. 646 (Hosch v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Alsabrook v. Prudential Insurance
163 S.E. 706 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1932)
Burkhalter v. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co.
152 S.E. 98 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1930)
Hosch v. Smith
119 S.E. 667 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)