Burkhalter v. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co.

152 S.E. 98, 170 Ga. 237, 1930 Ga. LEXIS 426
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided February 26, 1930·No. No. 7273·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This case involves a distribution of money arising from the sale of property under a senior judgment and execution. The holder of a junior judgment and execution claims the fund upon the ground that the judgment in the older case is void, because at the time of its rendition the defendant therein was insane and confined in the State Sanitarium. Held, that this is not an equity case within the meaning of the constitution declaring the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court. Ga. L. 1916, p. 19; Berrie v. Smith, 97 Ga. 782 (25 S. E. 757) ; Elmore v. Southern Bank & Trust Co., 150 Ga. 811 (105 S. E. 474) ; Hosch v. Smith, 154 Ga. 789 (115 S. E. 646). Accordingly, the ease will he Transferred to the Court of Appeals.

Russell, C. J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burkhalter v. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co., 152 S.E. 98, 170 Ga. 237, 1930 Ga. LEXIS 426 (Ga. 1930).

152 S.E. 98 (Burkhalter v. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Refrigeration-Appliances, Inc. v. Atlanta Provision Co.
80 S.E.2d 683 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1954)
Williams v. Russell
60 S.E.2d 243 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1950)
Mulligan v. Wingard
33 S.E.2d 269 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1945)
Piedmont Savings Co. v. Chapman
153 S.E. 4 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1930)