Horton v. Washington County Tax Claim Bureau

55 A.3d 1054, 618 Pa. 170, 2012 Pa. LEXIS 2628

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Horton v. Washington County Tax Claim Bureau. Read the opinion of the Court — 623 Pa. 113 →

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 9, 2012·No. No. 291 WAL 2012·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 9th day of November 2012, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is set forth below.

(1) Whether the Commonwealth Court erred in affirming the trial court’s decision to set aside the upset tax sale on the basis that the bureau failed to provide certificates of mailing under 72 P.S. § 5860.602(E)(2) where the trial court made an express finding that the bureau mailed each tax payer a notice of tax sale on August 27, 2009 by first class mail, and the trial court’s finding is supported by substantial, undisputed evidence?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 9th day of November 2012, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is set forth below.

(1) Whether the Commonwealth Court erred in affirming the trial court’s decision to set aside the upset tax sale on the basis that the bureau failed to provide certificates of mailing under 72 P.S. § 5860.602(E)(2) where the trial court made an express finding that the bureau mailed each tax payer a notice of tax sale on August 27, 2009 by first class mail, and the trial court’s finding is supported by substantial, undisputed evidence?

Horton v. Washington County Tax Claim Bureau, 55 A.3d 1054, 618 Pa. 170, 2012 Pa. LEXIS 2628 (Pa. 2012).

Pincite

55 A.3d 1054 (Horton v. Washington County Tax Claim Bureau) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.