Horton v. Martin

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-1455

JOHN D. HORTON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JAMES ANTHONY MARTIN; MATTHEW COAKLEY; WILLIAM WEBB, Honorable; ANNE HAYES; MALCOLM J. HOWARD, Honorable; GEOFFREY HOSFORD,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-04-976)

Submitted: August 25, 2005 Decided: August 31, 2005

Before TRAXLER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John D. Horton, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

John D. Horton appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find

that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal

for the reasons stated by the district court. See Horton v.

Martin, No. CA-04-976 (E.D.N.C. Mar. 25, 2005). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

- 2 -