Horton v. Martin
This text of Horton v. Martin (Horton v. Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1455
JOHN D. HORTON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JAMES ANTHONY MARTIN; MATTHEW COAKLEY; WILLIAM WEBB, Honorable; ANNE HAYES; MALCOLM J. HOWARD, Honorable; GEOFFREY HOSFORD,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-04-976)
Submitted: August 25, 2005 Decided: August 31, 2005
Before TRAXLER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John D. Horton, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
John D. Horton appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find
that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal
for the reasons stated by the district court. See Horton v.
Martin, No. CA-04-976 (E.D.N.C. Mar. 25, 2005). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Horton v. Martin, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/horton-v-martin-ca4-2005.