Horton v. Addy

631 N.E.2d 123, 69 Ohio St. 3d 181
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 4, 1994·No. No. 93-592·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

The judgment of the court of appeals is vacated and the appeal is dismissed for want of a final appealable order. The causis is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.

Moyer, C.J., AW. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Horton v. Addy, 631 N.E.2d 123, 69 Ohio St. 3d 181 (Ohio 1994).

631 N.E.2d 123 (Horton v. Addy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Menda v. Springfield Radiologists, Inc.
737 N.E.2d 590 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2000)
Walters v. The Enrichment Ctr. of Wishing Well, Inc.
1997 Ohio 232 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1997)
Walters v. Enrichment Center of Wishing Well, Inc.
1997 Ohio 232 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1997)
State ex rel. Steckman v. Jackson
639 N.E.2d 83 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1994)