Horsley v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Horsley v. State

374 So. 2d 375

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedJune 1, 1979

Docket78-87

StatusPublished

Cited by17 cases

This text of 374 So. 2d 375 (Horsley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Horsley v. State, 374 So. 2d 375 (Ala. 1979).

Pincite

Opinions

This cause is due to be affirmed on authority of Ex parteBaldwin v. State, 372 So.2d 32 (Ala. 1979).

We have carefully reviewed the opinion of the Court of Criminal Appeals and the record of the proceedings in this cause, and are convinced that the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals is due to be, and is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

TORBERT, C.J., and BLOODWORTH, MADDOX, FAULKNER, SHORES and EMBRY, JJ., concur.

JONES, J., concurs in the result for the same reason stated in Ex parte Baldwin v. State, 372 So.2d 32 (Ala. 1979).

BEATTY, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This cause is due to be affirmed on authority of Ex parteBaldwin v. State, 372 So.2d 32 (Ala. 1979).

We have carefully reviewed the opinion of the Court of Criminal Appeals and the record of the proceedings in this cause, and are convinced that the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals is due to be, and is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

TORBERT, C.J., and BLOODWORTH, MADDOX, FAULKNER, SHORES and EMBRY, JJ., concur.

JONES, J., concurs in the result for the same reason stated in Ex parte Baldwin v. State, 372 So.2d 32 (Ala. 1979).

BEATTY, J., dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

374 So. 2d 375, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/horsley-v-state-ala-1979.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack