Horsley v. State
374 So. 2d 375
Opinions
This cause is due to be affirmed on authority of Ex parteBaldwin v. State,
We have carefully reviewed the opinion of the Court of Criminal Appeals and the record of the proceedings in this cause, and are convinced that the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals is due to be, and is affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
TORBERT, C.J., and BLOODWORTH, MADDOX, FAULKNER, SHORES and EMBRY, JJ., concur.
JONES, J., concurs in the result for the same reason stated in Ex parte Baldwin v. State,
BEATTY, J., dissents.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Horsley v. State, 374 So. 2d 375 (Ala. 1979).
374 So. 2d 375 (Horsley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bryan Pettibone v. State of Alabama.
91 So. 3d 94 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2011)
Dill v. State
723 So. 2d 787 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1998)
Edward Horsley v. State of Alabama
45 F.3d 1486 (Eleventh Circuit, 1995)
Hunt v. State
642 So. 2d 999 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1994)
Jackson v. Thigpen
752 F. Supp. 1551 (N.D. Alabama, 1990)
Horsley v. State
527 So. 2d 1355 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1988)
Peoples v. State
510 So. 2d 554 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1986)
Ex Parte Potts
426 So. 2d 896 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1983)
Potts v. State
426 So. 2d 886 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1982)
Horsley v. State
409 So. 2d 1346 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1981)
Beck v. State
396 So. 2d 645 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1981)
Griffin v. State
393 So. 2d 523 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1981)
Thomas v. State
393 So. 2d 504 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1981)
Williamson v. Alabama
448 U.S. 903 (Supreme Court, 1980)