Horner v. Chamberlain
This text of 85 P. 927 (Horner v. Chamberlain) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This action was commenced to recover damages for malicious prosecution, and the pleadings and questions -involved herein are substantially the same as in the ease of Wm. J. Russell, Appellant, v. A. V. Chamberlain et al., Respondents, decided at this term of this court and reported in 85 Pac. 926, (ante, p. 299), and by stipulation of counsel this case was the follow the decision in the said case of Russell v. Chamberlain. On the authority of that ease, the judgment in this case must be reversed and the case remanded, with direction to the trial court to overrule the demurrers and to give the respondents a reasonable time in which to answer. Costs awarded to appellant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
85 P. 927, 12 Idaho 304, 1906 Ida. LEXIS 49, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/horner-v-chamberlain-idaho-1906.