Horn v. Kraft Heinz Foods Company LLC

District Court, E.D. California·Decided December 6, 2024·No. 1:21-cv-01258·Unknown

Opinion

1 SABA BIREDA (pro hac vice) MICHELE HAYDEL GEHRKE (#215647) JAMES HANNAWAY (pro hac vice) Reed Smith LLP 2 Sanford Heisler Sharp McKnight, LLP 101 Second Street, Suite 1800 700 Pennsylvania Avenue S.E., Suite 300 San Francisco, CA 94105 3 Washington, DC 20003 Telephone: (415) 543-8700 Telephone: (202) 499-5209 Fax: (415) 391-8269 4 Fax: (202) 499-5199 Email: mgehrke@reedsmith.com Email: sbireda@sanfordheisler.com 5 JILL S. VOROBIEV (pro hac vice) CARA VAN DORN (#321669) DAVID T. HARTMANN (pro hac vice) 6 Sanford Heisler Sharp McKnight, LLP Reed Smith LLP 7911 Herschel Avenue, Suite 300 10 South Wacker Drive 7 La Jolla, CA 92037 Chicago, IL 60606 Telephone: (619) 577-4253 Telephone: (312) 207-1000 8 Fax: (619) 577-4250 Fax: (312) 207-6400 Email: cvandorn@sanfordheisler.com Email: jvorobiev@reedsmith.com 9 Attorneys for Plaintiffs AMANDA BROWN (#292559) 10 Reed Smith LLP 2850 N. Harwood Street, Suite 1500 11 Dallas, TX 75201 Telephone: (469) 680-4232 12 Email: aebrown@reedsmith.com

13 Attorneys for Defendant 14 15 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 19 ALEX HORN, LANCE AYTMAN, AND Case No. 1:21-CV-01258-JLT-BAM KEITH HOOKER, 20 [PROPOSED] ORDER CLOSING CASE Plaintiffs, 21 District Judge: Jennifer L. Thurston v. 22 Magistrate Judge: Barbara A. McAuliffe KRAFT HEINZ FOODS COMPANY 23 LLC, Complaint Filed: August 19, 2021

24 Defendant.

26 27 28 1 On December 5, 2024, the parties filed a joint stipulation for voluntary dismissal with 2 | prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)Gi). (Dkt. 156). Pursuant to Rule 41(a), a 3 | plaintiff may dismiss an action without court order in one of two ways: (1) by filing a notice of 4 | dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment, 5 | or (2) by stipulation of all parties who have appeared. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)G) & (ii). 6 | Voluntary dismissal under this rule requires no action on the part of the court. See United States v. 7 | 475 Martin Lane, 545 F.3d 1134, 1145 (9th Cir. 2008) (voluntary dismissal pursuant to Rule 8 | 41(a)(1) is self-executing and requires no further action by court). 9 Here, the parties’ joint stipulation of dismissal is consistent with Federal Rule of Civil 10 | Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i1). Thus, the parties’ stipulated dismissal of this action with prejudice, 11 | with each party bearing that party’s own attorneys’ fees and costs, is effective upon its filing and 12 | without a court order. 13 Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is directed to CLOSE THE CASE. 14 15 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 Dated: _ December 6, 2024 Charis [Tourn TED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ADRAED TA CTI ACE CAGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Horn v. Kraft Heinz Foods Company LLC, (E.D. Cal. 2024).

Horn v. Kraft Heinz Foods Company LLC (Horn v. Kraft Heinz Foods Company LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related