Horlbeck v. Walther

279 P.2d 434, 131 Colo. 36, 1955 Colo. LEXIS 366
CourtSupreme Court of Colorado
DecidedJanuary 17, 1955
Docket17428
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 279 P.2d 434 (Horlbeck v. Walther) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Horlbeck v. Walther, 279 P.2d 434, 131 Colo. 36, 1955 Colo. LEXIS 366 (Colo. 1955).

Opinion

279 P.2d 434 (1955)

Richard F. HORLBECK and Ruth S. Horlbeck, Plaintiffs in Error,
v.
Leona WALTHER, Defendant in Error.

No. 17428.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

January 17, 1955.
Rehearing Denied January 31, 1955.

Howard E. Erickson, Denver, for plaintiff in error.

Elias J. Candell, Lakewood, for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM.

Nowhere in the record submitted by plaintiffs in error does it appear that a judgment was entered against them in the trial court. We find original and amended findings of fact by the trial judge and direction to the clerk for the entry of judgment, but no such judgment was ever entered of record in the trial court. Rule 112(a), R.C.P.Colo. requiring the inclusion of the judgment in the record is mandatory, and without a compliance therewith there is *435 nothing for this court to review. Savageau, Inc., v. Larsen, 117 Colo. 229, 185 P.2d 1012; Howard v. American Law Book Co., 121 Colo. 5, 212 P.2d 1006. The writ of error is, therefore, dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Horlbeck v. Walther
291 P.2d 688 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1955)
Nutter v. Wright
287 P.2d 655 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1955)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
279 P.2d 434, 131 Colo. 36, 1955 Colo. LEXIS 366, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/horlbeck-v-walther-colo-1955.