Hopson v. Smyth

182 F.2d 936, 1950 U.S. App. LEXIS 2882
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 14, 1950
Docket6084
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 182 F.2d 936 (Hopson v. Smyth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hopson v. Smyth, 182 F.2d 936, 1950 U.S. App. LEXIS 2882 (4th Cir. 1950).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal in a habeas corpus case. The appellant is held in custody under the judgment of a Virginia state court; and it appears not only that there is no merit in his petition but also that he has not exhausted his remedies under state law. The order of the lower court would, *937 therefore, he affirmed if the appeal were properly before us. Darr v. Burford, 339 U.S. 200, 70 S.Ct. 587; Washington v. Smyth, 4 Cir., 167 F.2d 658. It is not properly before us, however, because not supported by a certificate of probable cause as required by 28 U.S.C.A. § 2253, and must accordingly be dismissed. Bernard v. Brady, 4 Cir., 164 F.2d 881.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harris v. Ellis
204 F.2d 685 (Fifth Circuit, 1953)
Lyle v. Eidson, Warden
197 F.2d 327 (Eighth Circuit, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
182 F.2d 936, 1950 U.S. App. LEXIS 2882, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hopson-v-smyth-ca4-1950.