Hopson v. Johnson
This text of 34 S.E. 848 (Hopson v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
As was distinctly ruled in Harrison v. McClelland, 57 Ga. 531, “The maker of a promissory note is bound personally, though the word ‘administratrix’ be annexed to her signature”; and the same is true though that word be followed by the word “of” and the name of a deceased person. Civil Code, § 2998; Cleaveland v. Stewart, 3 Ga. 283; Aven v. Beckom, 11 Ga. 6; Lovelace v. Smith, 39 Ga. 132; McFarlin v. Stinson, 56 Ga. 398; Rawlings v. Robson, 70 Ga. 595; Crusselle v. Chastain, 76 Ga. 840.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
34 S.E. 848, 110 Ga. 283, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 563, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hopson-v-johnson-ga-1899.