Harrison v. McClelland
Opinion
The law of the case is presented with sufficient fullness in the notes read from the bencii. The plaintiff in error cited Story on Prom. Notes, section 63; 1 Parsons on Notes and Bills, 161; 39 Georgia Reports, 130 ; McFarlin vs. Stinson, 56 Ibid., 396; Acts of 1869, p. 133; 51 Georgia Reports, 107; 50 Ibid., 382 ; Galloway vs. West, July Term, 1876 ; 49 Ibid., 431; 50 Ibid., 382; Code, section 2915; 16 Georgia Reports, 382 : 29 Ibid., 700 ; Code, section 5 ; 12 Georgia Reports, 459; 44 Ibid., 128; Code, section 2724. The defendant in error cited 1 Ves. Sen’r., 126 ; 3 Bur. 1890; 2 Williams on Executors, 1512, 1514; 1 Saunders, 210: 9 Wend., 273.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
57 Ga. 531 (Harrison v. McClelland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.